A friend of mine pointed me to a bizarre site called Blackle which is, essentially, Google with a black background. Blacke claims that:

Blackle saves energy because the screen is predominantly black. “Image displayed is primarily a function of the user’s color settings and desktop graphics, as well as the color and size of open application windows; a given monitor requires more power to display a white (or light) screen than a black (or dark) screen.” Roberson et al, 2002 (…) We encourage you to set Blackle as your home page. This way every time you load your Internet browser you will save a little bit of energy. Remember every bit counts! You will also be reminded about the need to save energy each time you see the Blackle page load.

Which seems to be a ludicrous attempt to capitalize on web audience based on the fact that people tend to believe in the strangest things if they’re told it’s for some noble cause. While it is actually true for CRT monitors, the first thing that popped in my mind is that the effect should be exactly the opposite in LCD displays. From Wikipedia:

In a twisted nematic device (still the most common liquid crystal device), the surface alignment directions at the two electrodes are perpendicular, and so the molecules arrange themselves in a helical structure, or twist. (…) When a voltage is applied across the electrodes, a torque acts to align the liquid crystal molecules parallel to the electric field, distorting the helical structure (this is resisted by elastic forces since the molecules are constrained at the surfaces). This reduces the rotation of the polarization of the incident light, and the device appears gray. If the applied voltage is large enough, the liquid crystal molecules are completely untwisted and the polarization of the incident light is not rotated at all as it passes through the liquid crystal layer. This light will then be polarized perpendicular to the second filter, and thus be completely blocked and the pixel will appear black.

So in most LCD displays, the amount of energy applied to produce a black pixel is actually larger than producing a white pixel. No wonder screen savers in Nokia and Sony Ericsson cell phones are mostly white. But one doesn’t even need to gather information elsewhere about power usage in LCD devices, a quick look at the paper cited as reference in Blackle itself reveals that:

Among CRTs, maximum on power appears to be associated with a white display, or a maximum-sized application window (which approximates a white display). Among the few LCD monitors in the table, the power used to display a white screen is indistinguishable from power used to display the desktop. Thus, it appears that display color is a significant determinant of on power for CRTs, but not for LCDs.

If you want to be a nice person and save the planet, do it the right way. Research. Check if your acts actually have some significance. Don’t believe something just because someone told it’s a good thing. If you are actually concerned and want to help, good. Buy a less power-hungry CPU. Install cpufreq. Use power management. Reduce brightness or intensity of the backlight. Turn off lights you don’t need. Use Blackle you find it funny and amusing, but don’t do that thinking you’re doing any good — especially if you use an LCD monitor. It’s plain stupid.

5 Responses to “Black and white”

  1. Jim Riley says:

    As with “carbon neutral”, wind “farms”, solar and climate change, Blackle’s claims are based upon junk science, scare-mongering and a good dose of outright mendacity.

    We are already seeing numerous organisations being investigated for fraud in connection with the ridiculous “carbon trading” schemes. In Australia the ACCC should investigate Blackle for making false claims and hoodwinking people.

  2. claudio says:

    I often find events promoted as “carbon-free” or “anti-carbon” offensive, not only because I’m a carbon-based lifeform but because part of the attending people actually believe that it works, perhaps allowing them to feel less guilty about the environment and keep living their normal lives. Having an educated population that actually knows what works and what doesn’t seems to be much better, to the environment and to themselves.

  3. Matt Daniels says:

    This hit is thanks to Blackle.

    I first saw Blackle ten minutes ago and had the same immediate suspicion as you, Claudio. So I went looking. To my surprise, there’s not a lot of information online about relative power consumption of screens displaying different colors or brightness. But what information there is forms a pretty strong consensus (how you must hate that word, Jim).

    LCDs use very slightly more power when black and CRTs use 25% less power when black. Given that CRTs already consume 300% more power than LCDs, and there are far more CRTs in use, we’d get a huge net power savings if the whole world switched to Blackle right now.

    This guy claims he saved 15% on his office power bill by keeping his screens dark. Was he hoodwinked? Is that junk?

    I tend to agree with you guys that much of what passes for “green” living is a conscience salve with negligible results for the environment. But that doesn’t mean that the net effect of these incremental changes is negative, or that they’re all pointless.

  4. Nightcrawler says:

    Unfortunatelly that is all pointless. Claiming that CRTs use 25% less power when black is a huge generalization. It differs from model to model, but usually these figures are about 10-15%.

    If you really want to save power you can buy a LCD. Since you claim that a CRT uses 300% more power you’d be practically getting the LCD for free in long term.

    Using blackle is just a useless drop in the ocean. You can have a million drops and it won’t make a difference. What did you expect from a COMMERCIAL organisation?

    What blackle did successfully do is waste a lot of people’s time. How much time, resources and electricity was WASTED while trying prove that this whole blackle nonsense in nothing more than SPAM.

    Here are a few numbers:
    http://techlogg.com/content/view/360/1/

    Oh and just in case someone isn’t entirely convinced that this is complete and utter rubbish - how many hours per day do you just leave google open for no reason?

    People go to google, type in their phrase and in 2 seconds they’re off.
    Some people even use toolbars so that makes blackle utterly useless.

    Any effect that blackle may have is completely negligible, other than serving their own selfish commercial purposes - page hits.

  5. Ice says:

    There are around 16 different versions of “black google” online. The best one I’ve found is http://www.cleanblack.com. Cleanblack is the only version that allows you to change the text colors of the google search results. Try it yourself by going to http://www.cleanblack.com/theme/

Leave a Reply